A new removable airway stent


A new removable airway stent

Tore Amundsen1,2*, Sveinung Sørhaug1,2, Håkon Olav Leira1,2, Stig Sverre Tyvold3, Thomas Langø4,5, Tommy Hammer6, Frode Manstad-Hulaas2,6 and Erney Mattsson2,7

1Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; 2Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Technology and Science (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; 3Aleris Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; 4Department of Medical Technology, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway; 5Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Ultrasound and image-guided therapy, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; 6Department of Radiology, St, Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; 7Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway


Background: Malignant airway obstruction is a feared complication and will most probably occur more frequently in the future because of increasing cancer incidence and increased life expectancy in cancer patients. Minimal invasive treatment using airway stents represents a meaningful and life-saving palliation. We present a new removable airway stent for improved individualised treatment.

Methods: To our knowledge, the new airway stent is the world’s first knitted and uncovered self-expanding metal stent, which can unravel and be completely removed. In an in vivo model using two anaesthetised and spontaneously breathing pigs, we deployed and subsequently removed the stents by unravelling the device. The procedures were executed by flexible bronchoscopy in an acute and a chronic setting – a ‘proof-of-principle’ study.

Results: The new stent was easily and accurately deployed in the central airways, and it remained fixed in its original position. It was easy to unravel and completely remove from the airways without clinically significant complications. During the presence of the stent in the chronic study, granulation tissue was induced. This tissue disappeared spontaneously with the removal.

Conclusions: The new removable stent functioned according to its purpose and unravelled easily, and it was completely removed without significant technical or medical complications. Induced granulation tissue disappeared spontaneously. Further studies on animals and humans are needed to define its optimal indications and future use.

Keywords: interventional bronchoscopy; airway stent; malignant airway obstruction; SEMS; lung cancer

Citation: European Clinical Respiratory Journal 2016, 3: 30010 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ecrj.v3.30010

Copyright: © 2016 Tore Amundsen et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Received: 12 October 2015; Accepted: 2 August 2016; Published: 6 September 2016

Competing interests and funding: Dr E Mattsson, the inventor of the stent, is a shareholder of GraftCraft AB. There are no other conflicts of interest concerning him or the other authors.

*Correspondence to: Tore Amundsen, Department of Thoracic Medicine, AHL-Center, St. Olavs Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway, Email: tore.amundsen@ntnu.no


Benign and malignant airway obstruction (MAO) may affect individuals at all ages. The physicians must think and act differently in each case, depending on the cause, the characteristics of the airway obstruction, and the individual patient. The treatment options are numerous, including interventional bronchoscopy, systemic treatment, and endobronchial and extrathoracic irradiation. The need for optimal individualised treatment is a fact (13).

Benign airway obstruction comprises fibrous membrane stenosis, post-infectious granulomas and strictures, tracheobronchomalacia, foreign bodies, and severe haemoptysis. MAO is more frequent in the adult population, expressed either as intrabronchial tumour growth or external tumour compression, not seldom complicated with trachea-esophageal fistulas and airway stenosis (4). Figure 1 shows an example of an MAO before and after multimodal treatment. MAO will most probably occur more frequently in the future because of increasing cancer incidence and increased life expectancy. Patients with MAO are often suffering from mild to severe dyspnoea, cough, recurrent pneumonia and frequent hospitalisation, and the prognosis varies considerably (5). These secondary symptoms can also become life-threatening. Minimal invasive treatment using airway stents often represents a meaningful and life-saving palliation, with or without local or systemic supplementary therapy (613) (Fig. 1).

Fig 1

Fig. 1.   Illustration of a life-threatening malignant central airway obstruction. CT images, 1–2: coronal and transversal slices showing almost complete occlusion of the right and left main bronchus by a tumour; video bronchoscopy, image 3: protruding tumour at the level of carina; CT images, 4–5: coronal and transversal slices showing the reestablished lumen of both main bronchi after stent implantation and radiotherapy.

Thermal ablation (e.g. laser, diathermia and cryo techniques) or brachytherapy applied with bronchoscopy is often used to treat MAO. Thermal ablation is contraindicated in stenosis caused by pure external tumour compression, often leaving stent therapy as the best choice. There are different types of stents available on the market. Some silicone stents are radiopaque and some are not; deployment needs rigid bronchoscopy and general anaesthesia, but these stents can be removed. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are visible by X-ray; deployment can be performed with flexible bronchoscopy using conscious sedation combined with local anaesthetics. Uncovered SEMS can be difficult to remove because of epithelisation, ingrowth of tumour and granulomatous tissue. This drawback is less pronounced in first weeks after deployment and less a problem in covered stents. Uncovered SEMS are avoided in benign airway disorders and in patients with MAO who have a longer life expectancy. Complications to airway stents are migration within the airways, granuloma formation, mucostasis and pneumonia, mucosal ischaemia and fistulas. This is because of the radial pressure on neighbouring tissue induced by the stent. Complications may also be associated with the underlying condition or comorbidity (12, 14, 15). Correct choice of stent material, covered or not covered, shape, size and radial strength reduce the complication rate. Long-lasting stents may need subsequent dilatation (4, 12, 16).

Lacking the possibility of removing uncovered SEMS, especially after 6–8 weeks, is a clinically important limitation of the functionality of the stent. Covered SEMS are often used in patients with MAO and short lifetime expectancy (1, 3, 6, 1719). First, removable uncovered SEMS, which do not obstruct airway branches and thereby maintain ventilation, could be a good alternative for patients with MAO who have a longer life expectancy and for those with benign airway disorders. Second, temporary stenting would be favourable in many cases, such as during and after interventional bronchoscopy or following extrathoracic radiation and brachytherapy to reduce the development of phthisis, scar and stenosis formation (20). Third, the physician would appreciate the opportunity to remove the stent at any time, also during the deployment to guarantee the final stent placement to be optimal (21). In this study, we performed both acute and chronic observations in an animal model with spontaneous breathing pigs. The aim was to test the basic functionality of a new removable knitted stent that can unravel and be completely removed, a ‘proof-of-principle’ study.


Removable stent

The removable stent used in the two current experiments represents a new type of uncovered self-expanding metal stent made by the memory alloy nitinol (Fig. 2). The stent is knitted and can thereby unravel into the single thread from which it was made. Furthermore, the knitting technique makes it possible to produce the stent for a variety of indications, varying thread thickness and mesh size giving varying radial strengths, dimensions (length and diameter) and shapes, including Y-formation. It can therefore be customised and made to suit different tumour and patient characteristics. Therefore, it may respond to the clinical needs for individualised treatment, and in that case, it can be delivered within 24 h. The usual situations should, however, be possible to cover by devices from the shelf in the hospitals doing the procedures. In this study, the stents were knitted with a nitinol thread having a diameter of 0.1 mm. The knitting pattern was adjusted to reach a radial force corresponding to the commercially available stents of today, such as the Ultraflex stent. The stents were cooled down in wet ice before being packed into delivery sheaths, which were adjusted from standard vascular introducers with an outer diameter of 6 French. The delivery sheaths containing the stents were soaked in ethanol as disinfection and thereafter sterilised.

Fig 2

Fig. 2.   The new removable stent (magnified) made by self-expanding nitinol with a thread that extends beyond the tubular part. The end of the thread can be placed at a distance and be used to unravel the device to the thread from which it was made and remove the stent.

The stent is knitted from a nitinol thread. Nitinol is a memory alloy, and the stent thereby belongs to the group of SEMS. There is usually no need for any balloon dilatation after deployment of the stent. The mechanical impact and radial force can be predefined and specified according to the individual needs, which increases the possibilities for successful individualised treatment. Before this study, the new removable stent has been thoroughly tested, in vitro for its mechanical properties and as vascular stent in iliac arteries in sheep in acute and chronic studies, with successful unravelling. The stent is ordered and produced online based on specifications of needs for a specific person and condition. It is produced at GraftCraft AB, Borås, Sweden. The stent is not approved for medical use in humans, but based on this and further studies, this is the plan.


The aim of the study was to test whether the new removable stent would function according to its purpose, in the airways, in terms of efficacy (deployment and accurate placement), safety (adverse events) and the ability to be removed (unravelling characteristics). The study was performed in an acute and a chronic setting using an in vivo animal study with two spontaneously breathing pigs – ‘A proof-of-principle study’. The procedure was first tested in a phantom model and subsequently in the animal model (Fig. 3).

Fig 3

Fig. 3.   The phantom model where the stent, introducer system and removability were tested before the animal study which took place at the Operating Room of the Future, ORF.

Animal model – spontaneously breathing pig

We established a novel in vivo animal model with spontaneous breathing anaesthetised pigs. The pigs were acclimatised for 1 week before the studies in the animal research department and fasted overnight before each experiment. Subcutaneous premedication was given (azaperon 16 mg/kg body weight (mg/kg bw), diazepam 0.25 mg/kg bw, ketamine 3 mg/kg bw and 1 mg atropinsulphate). Anaesthesia was given through a venous catheter in a marginal ear vein. Induction consisted of ketamine 3–4 mg/kg bw and sodium pentothal 2–3 mg/kg bw. The pig received a temporary or orotracheal tube for transportation between buildings. Maintenance anaesthesia was given as a continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine, midazolam and fentanyl.

The orotracheal tube was removed right before the start of the stenting procedure. To achieve spontaneous breathing and open airways, the jaws and tongue were fixed with smooth textile bonds. Adequate oxygenation (oxygen saturation 96–100%) was maintained by 10 l/min O2 supply on a nasal tube with an inner diameter of 4.0 mm. Complementary ketamine, midazolam and fentanyl were given when the respiratory rate increased, respiration deepened and/or the eyelash reflex was elicited by finger stroke. Heart rate was kept between 60 and 100 beats/min and blood pressure was kept within 100–120/60–80 mmHg.

Flexible bronchoscopy and stenting procedure

We used a flexible bronchoscope (Olympus BF 1T240, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan, 5.3 mm, 2.0 mm work channel) for inspection, deployment, unravelling and removal of the stents. The operating theatre was located at the Operating Room of the Future (ORF), which is dedicated to research and development activities. Deployment was facilitated by using a guide wire and an in-house-built introducer. The deployment and removal procedure was documented and guided through bronchoscopy videos and images, X-ray (fluoroscopy) and cone beam CT acquisition.

Acute study (Pig 1)

Deployment and accurate placement, subsequent unravelling and complete removal of differently sized stents in differently sized airways in both lungs were performed with a flexible bronchoscope (Table 1). During the unravelling procedure, the forceps that grabbed the extended thread were operated through a catheter to achieve a counter pressure on the tubular part of the stent, ensuring stable stent position during unravelling. The catheter with the forceps was introduced side by side and fixed to the tip of the bronchoscope with an elastic band. The animal was observed 8 h between placement and removal of the stent.

Table 1.  Study design
Acute study D1 (Pig 1) Chronic study D1 (Pig 2) Chronic study D14 Chronic study D18
Right MB: 14×20 mm stent, placement without GW, stent unravelling and removal
Left MB: 11×20 mm stent, placement with GW, stent unravelling and removal
Right distal MB (to lower lobe): 8×20 mm stent, placement with GW
Right proximal MB: 14×20 mm stent, placement with GW
Bronchoscopy, mucus removal, unravelling and complete removal of the proximal stent Bronchoscopy, removal of airway, including distal stent
D – Day, MB – main bronchus, GW – guide wire.

Chronic study (Pig 2)

Day 1: Deployment and accurate placement of stents, leaving one peripheral (8×20 mm) and one more proximal stent (11×20 mm) in the right (main) bronchus (Table 1). Thereafter, the animal was transported to the Animal Care Facility Unit (ACF) at Norwegian University of Technology and Science (NTNU) to recover from anaesthesia and was fed, stalled and observed for 14 days.

Day 14: Bronchoscopy during which the operator grabbed the proximal end of the thread with the forceps, pulled carefully and unravelled the proximal stent as one single thread in one sequence, as described above in the acute study. The distal stent was left behind. The animal was observed in the ACF for another 4 days.

Day 18: Bronchoscopy was performed to study the conditions and healing of the proximal right main bronchus after removal of the proximal stent and control of the position and bronchial condition of the residual distal stent.

In the acute and at all stages of the chronic study, acquisition of bronchoscopy images and videos were collected, together with X-ray (fluoroscopy) and cone beam CT images. During anaesthesia, the pig showed no spontaneous movement, but showed normal cardio-pulmonary functions and breathed spontaneously during the whole experiment.

Ethical aspects

The Local Ethics Committee of the Norwegian Experimental Animal Board approved the experiments in accordance with the Helsinki Convention for the use and care of animals.


Acute study (Pig 1)

The two stents (size 11×20 mm and 14×20 mm) were successfully deployed and accurately placed in the central airways, using a flexible bronchoscope and an in-house-built introducer and guide wire. The stents remained in their fixed positions before they were successfully unravelled and completely removed from the airways, carefully, in one sequence as a single thread (Fig. 4). The stents did not penetrate into or get stuck in the bronchial wall. The video bronchoscopy revealed no harm to the bronchial wall, no bleeding and no other complications, including clinical significant mucus retention. The stent, introducer, technique and procedure functioned according to its purpose. The results were found sufficiently successful in terms of efficacy and safety to proceed to the chronic part of the study.

Fig 4

Fig. 4.   Acute study: Day 1 – placement and unravelling phase – placement of the stent, a (distant view) and b (close view). The unravelling procedure, midways and before complete removal, c and d, respectively.

Chronic study (Pig 2)

Day 1: The two stents were successfully deployed and accurately placed in the right bronchial tree, one in distal position, lobe bronchus (8×20 mm stent), and the other in a more proximal position, main bronchus (11×20 mm stent), using the same instruments and technique as described in the Acute study section.

Day 14: The extended thread was immediately found using the bronchoscope, it was grasped with a forceps and the stent was easy to unravel and completely remove from the airways, with the technique described in the Methods section. The stent was carefully pulled out as a single thread in one sequence. The procedure was effective and safe, and was performed without technical or medical complications (Fig. 5). The video bronchoscopy revealed no harm to the bronchial wall, clinically significant mucus retention or other complications. A superficial minimal bleeding was easily and quickly cleaned by suction after unravelling the stent. The bronchial lumen was open for ventilation without any occurrence of atelectasis (CT images not shown). Moderate mucus retention was observed proximal to and inside the stent lumen. As expected, we observed granulation tissue, which was most prominent in the proximal and distal ends of the stents.

Fig 5

Fig. 5.   Chronic study: (a) Day 14 – after removal of proximal stent, and polyps are seen, (b) Day 18 – same area 4 days later showing dramatic healing and (c) Day 18 – view of the residual distal stent.

Day 18: We observed the same phenomenon in the residual distal stent with occurrence of mucus retention and granulation tissue. At this time, the proximal main bronchus from where the proximal stent had been removed was almost free from mucosal inflammation and granulation tissue. The bronchial wall had recovered almost completely 4 days after removal of the stent (Fig. 5 – Day 18).


The new removable SEMS was successfully deployed and accurately placed in the airways; it expanded in accordance with its purpose and remained in a fixed position, both in peripheral and more proximal parts of the right bronchial tree. It was easy to unravel and completely remove without significant medical or technical complications, regarding both the acute and chronic study. The stent was removed carefully as one single metal thread in one sequence. In this ‘proof-of-principle study’, the stent fulfilled its expected efficacy, safety and feasibility. No other studies with predesigned unravelling, removable and uncovered SEMS are known to date. Inflammatory adverse events and granulation tissue, associated with present available uncovered SEMS, also occurred using the new removable stent. To our experience, this phenomenon was shown to be of the same quality and extent as we have seen with ordinary uncovered stents. We emphasise that after the stent removal, the inflammation and granulation tissue had almost disappeared within 4 days, leaving the bronchial wall in a good recovery state.

The current feasibility study was a preclinical proof-of-principle study in presumptively healthy pigs. The results should therefore be interpreted with caution before extended to the treatment of MAO in human beings. The relevance of the animal model for the present hypothesis may therefore be questioned. With respect to the difference between healthy airways of pigs versus MAO in human beings, the findings cannot directly be transferred. Apart from that, the choice of species can be fairly well argued for the main purpose of this initial feasibility study. First, porcine models have been established as reliable animal models for a variety of human lung-related conditions, regarding anatomy and size to genetic and translational medicine, including our own experience (2224). Testing technical feasibility like deployment and removal of the stent, in both the acute and chronic study, should be very well fitted using this model. Second, assessing the local inflammatory response to the stent material, we emphasise that the porcine model has shown to be the best animal model in the study of wound healing, comparing mammals and humans. The two species have to a large degree similar genome, genetic activation and cellular and subcellular expression of healing processes, including haemostasis and inflammatory responses (2527). This has been shown to be valid in terms of quality (physiological and pathophysiological process), quantity (degree of reaction) and time perspective (time from trauma or intervention to response), and it is of course partially dependent on study conditions. This study demonstrated an inflammatory airway response similar to the response known in human beings, using ordinary airway SEMS. However, we observed an almost complete recovery of the inflammatory responses 4 days after removal, which supports the importance of not leaving a stent behind for longer than necessary. Third, based on the aspects mentioned above, we find the animal study relevant for the very first feasibility evaluation of the new airway stent, being aware of the limitations mentioned.

Removal of ordinary uncovered SEMS may cause harm to the bronchus and promote bleeding, especially 6–8 weeks after deployment. Covered SEMS can be removed, but also these stents may cause complications due to inflammation, granulation tissue and ingrowth – especially at the proximal and distal ends. In this study, a superficial bleeding occurred after unravelling the stent in the chronic study, which was easily and quickly cleaned by suction and ceased.

To sum up, the pros are 1) easy and accurate deployment with the possibility to change stents during the procedure, 2) stents remained in fixed positions in the airways over 18 days (endoscopy and CT documentation, the latter not shown), 3) easy unravelling and complete removal of the stent without significant technical or medical complications and 4) pronounced and fast mucosal recovery after removal of the stent. Cons are 1) the occurrence of some mucosal retention and 2) inflammatory granulation tissue, as expected in all commercially available stents to date. The new stent functioned according to its purpose and it seems promising for human use.

Area of utilisation may be wide and appropriate. First, uncovered SEMS may maintain airway branch ventilation better than covered or silicon stents, and the new stent may cover all established indications of ordinary SEMS. Second, removable stents may be favourable as short-term or temporary use after interventional bronchoscopy, subsequent extra thoracic radiation or brachytherapy and thereby minimise development of stenosis formation and complicating atelectasis or obstructive pneumonia. The removal of the stent has the potential to further reduce the degree of granulation tissue, thereby achieving an even larger bronchus diameter. Third, the physician would appreciate the opportunity to remove the stent at any time, also during the deployment to guarantee optimal individualised treatment.

There may be some additional advantages: one can order the right size, shape and radial force and vary the thread dimensions and characteristics, and knitting characters. The final stent placement and function has a high potential to be optimal because the stent can be changed at any time. In summary, it may lead to an improved individualised endoscopic therapy. Results from human studies are necessary for final conclusions, but the results from the present proof-of-principle study seem promising for human use.


The new removable and uncovered self-expanding metal stent was successfully deployed in the central airways of pigs, using a flexible bronchoscope and spontaneously breathing animals. The stents remained fixed in their original positions and were easy to unravel and completely remove from the airways after 14 days, without any clinically significant complications. The removal imposed an almost complete recovery of the inflammatory responses within 4 days. Further studies on animals and humans are needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and optimal use of the new removable stent in human beings.


The authors acknowledge the local Cancer Foundation (Kreftfondet 67/2013) and Institute of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU (Aktivitetsmidler) for economic support; GraftCraft AB for delivering free stents for the study; Smart Textiles, The Swedish School of Textiles for producing the stents; the nurses at the ORF (Operating Room of the Future) and at the bronchoscopy suite; and the Animal Care Facility Unit at NTNU, Comparative medicine core facility.


  1. Du Rand IA, Barber PV, Goldring J, Lewis RA, Mandal S, Munavvar M, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for advanced diagnostic and therapeutic flexible bronchoscopy in adults. Thorax. 2011; 66(Suppl 3): iii1–21. Publisher Full Text
  2. Bolliger CT, Mathur PN, Beamis JF, Becker HD, Cavaliere S, Colt H, et al. ERS/ATS statement on interventional pulmonology. European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society. Eur Respir J. 2002; 19: 356–73. Publisher Full Text
  3. Simoff MJ, Lally B, Slade MG, Goldberg WG, Lee P, Michaud GC, et al. Symptom management in patients with lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143(5 Suppl): e455S–97S. Publisher Full Text
  4. Ernst A, Anantham D. Update on interventional bronchoscopy for the thoracic radiologist. J Thorac Imag. 2011; 26: 263–77. Publisher Full Text
  5. Song JU, Park HY, Kim H, Jeon K, Um SW, Koh WJ, et al. Prognostic factors for bronchoscopic intervention in advanced lung or esophageal cancer patients with malignant airway obstruction. Ann Thorac Med. 2013; 8: 86–92. Publisher Full Text
  6. Mitchell PD, Kennedy MP. Bronchoscopic management of malignant airway obstruction. Adv Ther. 2014; 31: 512–38. Publisher Full Text
  7. Dutau H, Musani AI, Plojoux J, Laroumagne S, Astoul P. The use of self-expandable metallic stents in the airways in the adult population. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2014; 8: 179–90. Publisher Full Text
  8. Andreetti C, D’Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Rendina EA. Treatment of a complex tracheobronchial malignant stenosis with a modified conical semicovered self-expanding stent. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 146: 488–9. Publisher Full Text
  9. Wu G, Li ZM, Han XW, Wang ZG, Lu HB, Zhu M, et al. Right bronchopleural fistula treated with a novel, Y-shaped, single-plugged, covered, metallic airway stent. Acta Radiol. 2013; 54: 656–60. Publisher Full Text
  10. Oki M, Saka H. New dedicated bifurcated silicone stent placement for stenosis around the primary right carina. Chest. 2013; 144: 450–5. Publisher Full Text
  11. Inchingolo R, Sabharwal T, Spiliopoulos S, Krokidis M, Dourado R, Ahmed I, et al. Tracheobronchial stenting for malignant airway disease: long-term outcomes from a single-center study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013; 30: 683–9. Publisher Full Text
  12. Eom JS, Kim H, Park HY, Jeon K, Um SW, Koh WJ, et al. Timing of silicone stent removal in patients with post-tuberculosis bronchial stenosis. Ann Thorac Med. 2013; 8: 218–23. Publisher Full Text
  13. Semaan R, Yarmus L. Rigid bronchoscopy and silicone stents in the management of central airway obstruction. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(Suppl 4): S352–62.
  14. Peng Z, Xu S, Li H, Sun C, Fu M. Metallic expandable stents in the management of malignant tracheal stenosis due to esophageal cancer with lymph node metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2013; 6: 1461–4.
  15. Fiorelli A, Accardo M, Galluccio G, Santini M. Tracheobronchial amyloidosis treated by endobronchial laser resection and self expanding Y stent. Arch Bronconeumol. 2013; 49: 303–5. Publisher Full Text
  16. Grosu HB, Eapen GA, Morice RC, Jimenez CA, Casal RF, Almeida FA, et al. Stents are associated with increased risk of respiratory infections in patients undergoing airway interventions for malignant airways disease. Chest. 2013; 144: 441–9. Publisher Full Text
  17. Lunn W, Feller-Kopman D, Wahidi M, Ashiku S, Thurer R, Ernst A. Endoscopic removal of metallic airway stents. Chest. 2005; 127: 2106–12. Publisher Full Text
  18. Chung FT, Chen GY, Chou CL, Chen HC, Yu CT, Kuo CH, et al. Remove airway ultraflex stents by flexible bronchoscope. Am J Med Sci. 2012; 343: 267–72. Publisher Full Text
  19. Chan AL, Juarez MM, Allen RP, Albertson TE. Do airway metallic stents for benign lesions confer too costly a benefit? BMC Pulm Med. 2008; 8: 7. Publisher Full Text
  20. Evans AJ, Lee DY, Jain AK, Razi SS, Park K, Schwartz GS, et al. The effect of metallic tracheal stents on radiation dose in the airway and surrounding tissues. J Surg Res. 2014; 189: 1–6. Publisher Full Text
  21. Grillo HC, Donahue DM. Post intubation tracheal stenosis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 8: 370–80.
  22. Judge EP, Hughes JM, Egan JJ, Maguire M, Molloy EL, O’Dea S. Anatomy and bronchoscopy of the porcine lung. A model for translational respiratory medicine. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014; 51: 334–43. Publisher Full Text
  23. Leira HO, Amundsen T, Tangen GA, Bo LE, Manstad-Hulaas F, Lango T. A novel research platform for electromagnetic navigated bronchoscopy using cone beam CT imaging and an animal model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011; 20: 30–41. Publisher Full Text
  24. Leira HO, Lango T, Sorger H, Hofstad EF, Amundsen T. Bronchoscope-induced displacement of lung targets: first in vivo demonstration of effect from wedging maneuver in navigated bronchoscopy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013; 20: 206–12. Publisher Full Text
  25. Seaton M, Hocking A, Gibran NS. Porcine models of cutaneous wound healing. ILAR J. 2015; 56: 127–38. Publisher Full Text
  26. Nuutila K, Katayama S, Vuola J, Kankuri E. Human wound-healing research: issues and perspectives for studies using wide-scale analytic platforms. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014; 3: 264–71. Publisher Full Text
  27. Rittie L. Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. J Cell Commun Signal. 2016; 10: 103–20. Publisher Full Text
About The Authors

Tore Amundsen


Sveinung Sørhaug


Håkon Olav Leira


Stig Sverre Tyvold


Thomas Lango


Tommy Hammer


Frode Manstad-Hulaas


Erney Mattsson


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Related Content